Hannibal
In
spite of my best efforts, I’ve become addicted to Hannibal.
Admittedly fairly late in the day, with the show now having
completed its second season.
Although
similar in conception, it is far superior to Dexter
(a show which manages the supreme feat of being both morally bankrupt
and boring to watch). Furthermore it is superior to much of its
source material: Lecter doesn’t go sleep in a coffin, when he isn’t
deploying his demonic superpowers like he does in Hannibal.
And it isn’t a big pile of
shit like Hannibal Rising.
What
makes the show compelling is, inevitably, the realisation of its
central villain, portrayed by Mads Mikkelsen who appears to have been
specially bred by scientists to answer the question, What would a
jackfish look like if it was a little bit sexy? He looks divine,
supremely peacocking it in floral ties and prince-of-wales check,
three-piece suits. We hardly ever see Hannibal finish a meal.
(Although given how extravagantly wasteful he is in the kitchen, I
wouldn’t be surprised if he threw it away after the first
mouthful.)The show’s most interesting decision is not to pair him
off with an immediately likeable adversary: Will Graham (much more
like his Manhunter
form than his sanitised 2002 version) struggles with his own psyche
and becomes increasingly morally compromised.
Hannibal is
delectable: costume, set, photography and (inevitably) food are
mouthwatering. Almost every detail in this show seems to have been
chosen from Lecter’s baroque standpoint. (I say “almost” -
there are some egregious misfires, such as Hannibal’s bedroom and
some other cock-swinging ornaments.)
Where the show’s
aesthetic sensibility really gleams is in its corpses. It was, to a
large extent, Harris’s fiction which inaugurated the premise that
every self-respecting, serial-killing psychopath needed an organising
conceit and that every spree was a concept album. The MOs are swatted
like mayflies. (Bodies are transfigured into totem poles, mushroom
gardens and a cello. That’s right. A cello.) All the murders seem
to have been imagined by Hannibal. It reaches its most meta moment
with a collage of human bodies creating a giant eye, staring back at
God (and the viewer, and Hannibal). It is this level of
sophistication that distinguishes it from its horror-thriller
comrades.
It’s
by no means flawless. The women are poorly written. Apparently, like
serial killers, they can only have one operative principle. This show
fails the Bechdel test, like, bigtime. But an even bigger problem is
how short the episodes are. Basically there is no third act. A
macabre corpse is discovered (often artfully lit) and then, before we
know it, the killer is dealt with. It’s like Columbo
without the “Just one more thing...” (and a heap more gore). The
show would have been much better off stringing out its secondary
killers over a season rather than attempting a monster of the week.
Admittedly by the end of the second season the monster of the week
has become a big (well middle-sized) bad in the form of Mason Verger.
But by that point he, unfortunately, gets in the way of the much more
interesting kiss-chase between Will and Hannibal. (The
homosocial/homoeroticism of which reaches staggeringly gay heights
with the Achilles-Patroclus insinuation and a supremely misjudged
doubled sex scene.)
It just gets better
every episode. And the conclusion to the second season is the sort of
thing that deserves assistants operating handheld aromatisers as you
consume it.
0 comments:
Post a Comment